Job Market Paper
Collective vs. Family Remembrance: Evidence From Two Russian "Betrayal" Policies [current draft]
Abstract: Is family or collective remembrance of the distant past more powerful in shaping current behavior? To answer this question, I link two historical episodes from Armenian history separated by a century. During both World War I (WWI) and the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War, Russia was anticipated to provide military support to Armenia, its ally, but failed to do so. I demonstrate that the memories of the first Russian "betrayal'' policy were activated after the second war. I use activation, which enhances the salience of memories, to disentangle the effects of family and collective remembrance. I identify family memory of the first "betrayal'' policy using distinct West Armenian (Ottoman Armenian) surnames and proxy collective memory through locations renamed to commemorate lost Armenian localities during WWI. The difference-in-differences (DiD) approach shows that both family and collective remembrance negatively affect pro-Russian parties' vote share, with all the conventional assumptions of DiD verified. Family remembrance influences behavior through traumatic recall, whereas collective remembrance operates via social capital.
Awards: PEDD Young Scholar Award 2024, Münster (Germany)
Info: Also available as CERGE-EI Working Paper No. 787 [read]
Collective vs. Family Remembrance: Evidence From Two Russian "Betrayal" Policies [current draft]
Abstract: Is family or collective remembrance of the distant past more powerful in shaping current behavior? To answer this question, I link two historical episodes from Armenian history separated by a century. During both World War I (WWI) and the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War, Russia was anticipated to provide military support to Armenia, its ally, but failed to do so. I demonstrate that the memories of the first Russian "betrayal'' policy were activated after the second war. I use activation, which enhances the salience of memories, to disentangle the effects of family and collective remembrance. I identify family memory of the first "betrayal'' policy using distinct West Armenian (Ottoman Armenian) surnames and proxy collective memory through locations renamed to commemorate lost Armenian localities during WWI. The difference-in-differences (DiD) approach shows that both family and collective remembrance negatively affect pro-Russian parties' vote share, with all the conventional assumptions of DiD verified. Family remembrance influences behavior through traumatic recall, whereas collective remembrance operates via social capital.
Awards: PEDD Young Scholar Award 2024, Münster (Germany)
Info: Also available as CERGE-EI Working Paper No. 787 [read]